Difference between revisions of "Talk:Frontends:Bookmarks Standard"
From CrossWire Bible Society
(Bookmarks) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Page name?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
For bookmarks we could use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBEL XBEL] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPML OPML] or some other known standard. Perhaps a wider issue is actually to standardize urn:sword:, an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Name Uniform Resource Name] for Sword-based resources. - [[User:Jotik|Jotik]] 09:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | For bookmarks we could use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBEL XBEL] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPML OPML] or some other known standard. Perhaps a wider issue is actually to standardize urn:sword:, an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Name Uniform Resource Name] for Sword-based resources. - [[User:Jotik|Jotik]] 09:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Page name? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shouldn't the page name be changed to '''Frontends:Bookmarks Standard'''? cf. Other pages in the [[:Category:SWORD Frontends]]. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 11:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:16, 24 March 2010
Bookmarks
For bookmarks we could use XBEL or OPML or some other known standard. Perhaps a wider issue is actually to standardize urn:sword:, an Uniform Resource Name for Sword-based resources. - Jotik 09:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Page name?
Shouldn't the page name be changed to Frontends:Bookmarks Standard? cf. Other pages in the Category:SWORD Frontends. David Haslam 11:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
