Difference between revisions of "Talk:DevTools:Text Editors"
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→XML Copy Editor 1.2.0.9 problem: new section) |
(→BabelPad) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please share with others what you find useful and why. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 11:55, 23 September 2011 (MDT) | Please share with others what you find useful and why. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 11:55, 23 September 2011 (MDT) | ||
| − | == | + | == Open Source only == |
| − | + | Please do not link or recommend non-open source programmes here on the Wiki. You might find them useful, fine. Recommend privately [[User:Refdoc|refdoc]]:[[User_Talk:Refdoc|talk]] 11:03, 10 January 2018 (MST) | |
| − | + | == BabelPad == | |
| + | |||
| + | I wouldn't be without [http://www.babelstone.co.uk/software/babelpad.html BabelPad]. It has many features that no other Unicode text editor provides. Just because we are an open source society should not mean that we should never recommend free software that is not open source. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] ([[User talk:David Haslam|talk]]) 05:59, 11 January 2018 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | if it is not open source it is not free software. No one stops you using it, no one asks you not to recommend it privately, but we will not promote non-free software on our servers. That is a long standing committment [[User:Refdoc|refdoc]]:[[User_Talk:Refdoc|talk]] 06:19, 11 January 2018 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 11 January 2018
Please share with others what you find useful and why. David Haslam 11:55, 23 September 2011 (MDT)
Open Source only
Please do not link or recommend non-open source programmes here on the Wiki. You might find them useful, fine. Recommend privately refdoc:talk 11:03, 10 January 2018 (MST)
BabelPad
I wouldn't be without BabelPad. It has many features that no other Unicode text editor provides. Just because we are an open source society should not mean that we should never recommend free software that is not open source. David Haslam (talk) 05:59, 11 January 2018 (MST)
if it is not open source it is not free software. No one stops you using it, no one asks you not to recommend it privately, but we will not promote non-free software on our servers. That is a long standing committment refdoc:talk 06:19, 11 January 2018 (MST)
