OSIS 211 CR
This page is for recording potential change requests to the OSIS XML schema.
Contents
OSIS 2.1.1 Change Requests
The Society of Biblical Literature conference in November 2011 provides a potential opportunity for a decision making meeting. Therefore anyone with an outstanding OSIS bug report or feature proposal for consideration for inclusion into an updated OSIS schema, please write a very concise change request here in this page, including motivating use case.
Bugs
osisGenRegex bug
Currently that regex looks like [1], but it should looks like [2]:
[1] ((((\p{L}|\p{N}|_)+)(\.(\p{L}|\p{N}|_))*:)?([^:\s])+) [2] ((((\p{L}|\p{N}|_)+)(\.(\p{L}|\p{N}|_)+)*:)?([^:\s])+) (missing + right here ^)
So our document with the following element isn't valid because the string "Strong" cannot be more than 1 character long in the current schema: <w morph="robinson:N-NSF" lemma="lemma.Strong:βίβλος">βίβλος</w> --Osk 19:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Feature requests
Allow <transChange> within <w>
An encoder ought to be allowed to put <transChange> on elements smaller than an orthographic word. If I'm translating an instance of "λόγος", but for some reason I believe that I should translate it as "words", I ought to be able to encode <w>word<transChange>s</transChange></w>. --Osk 19:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Add an element for morphology within <w>
Necessary for encoding documents like MORPH (WLC + morphology), we need an element to embed within <w> to carry lexical information. I suggest calling it <m> and giving it all of the attributes found on <w>. --Osk 19:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Allow <transChange> within <hi>
A highlighted sentence or part of a sentence is a unit, including any transChange parts of it. At the moment a highlighted sentence with a transChange will look like this: <hi type="bold"> Texttexttext </hi><transChange><hi type="bold"> moreText</hi></transChange><hi type="bold"> TextText</hi> <hi type="bold"> Texttexttext <transChange>moreText</transChange> TextText</hi>
This would look cleaner and would be also closer to what is meant. refdoc:talk 16:02, 3 August 2011 (MDT)