Difference between revisions of "Talk:BibTeX entries"
From CrossWire Bible Society
m (moved Talk:Bibtex entries to Talk:BibTeX entries) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Bibtex or BibTeX ?: :I see this is done. ''Thanks''. ~~~~) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I see this is done. ''Thanks''. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 11:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Separate the modules? == | == Separate the modules? == | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 13 January 2011
Bibtex or BibTeX ?
The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? David Haslam 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- I see this is done. Thanks. David Haslam 11:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Separate the modules?
It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. David Haslam 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Lowercase for keywords?
The Wikipedia page for BibTeX shows all the keywords as lowercase. Your first stab has "year" like this, but the others have initial capitals. Does this matter? David Haslam 10:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
No, is the short answer refdoc:talk 14:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
