Difference between revisions of "Talk:BibTeX entries"
From CrossWire Bible Society
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (Bibtex or BibTeX ?) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Separate the modules?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Separate the modules? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:21, 11 January 2011
Bibtex or BibTeX ?
The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? David Haslam 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Separate the modules?
It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. David Haslam 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
