Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dmsmith/KJV2011"
From CrossWire Bible Society
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (Why KJV2011 rather than KJV2010?) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Jeremiah 50:6: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Simples! To mark the [http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/ quatercentenary] of the 1611 AV. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 22:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | Simples! To mark the [http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/ quatercentenary] of the 1611 AV. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 22:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Jeremiah 50:6 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | A search of the KJV for the word '''resting''' gives five matches, all of which qualify the word '''place''' or '''places'''. The first four have a space (Numbers 10:33, II Chronicles 6:41, Proverbs 24:15, Isaiah 32:18). The fifth (Jeremiah 50:6) has no space. It would be more consistent if the KJV had a space here, so that an exact phrase search for '''resting place''' would not omit the fifth occurrence. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 12:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:11, 27 January 2011
Why KJV2011 rather than KJV2010?
Simples! To mark the quatercentenary of the 1611 AV. David Haslam 22:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Jeremiah 50:6
A search of the KJV for the word resting gives five matches, all of which qualify the word place or places. The first four have a space (Numbers 10:33, II Chronicles 6:41, Proverbs 24:15, Isaiah 32:18). The fifth (Jeremiah 50:6) has no space. It would be more consistent if the KJV had a space here, so that an exact phrase search for resting place would not omit the fifth occurrence. David Haslam 12:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)