Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alternate Versification"
From CrossWire Bible Society
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Heading levels in wikimedia pages: new section) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→How to identify whether an existing alternate versification scheme matches requirements?: new section) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The general preference is that only the page title should be at top heading level. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 17:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | The general preference is that only the page title should be at top heading level. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 17:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == How to identify whether an existing alternate versification scheme matches requirements? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | If a new [[Module Requests|module request]] requires alternate versification, how can we help to identify whether the requirements match a scheme that already exists at CrossWire? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 16:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:48, 26 April 2009
Go Bible Forum topic on Different Versification Systems
A topic on versification schemes has been added in the Go Bible Forum. See [1]. Initial focus is for Slavic languages (e.g. Russian, Ukrainian). I'm adding this link here in case further useful information gets posted. David Haslam 09:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Heading levels in wikimedia pages
The general preference is that only the page title should be at top heading level. David Haslam 17:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
How to identify whether an existing alternate versification scheme matches requirements?
If a new module request requires alternate versification, how can we help to identify whether the requirements match a scheme that already exists at CrossWire? David Haslam 16:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)