Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ideas for new projects"

From CrossWire Bible Society
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reason for this new page: :Some of the stuff deleted from our Current Projects page could be resurrected and added to this new page. ~~~~)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Some of the stuff deleted from our [[Current Projects]] page could be resurrected and added to this new page. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 07:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 
:Some of the stuff deleted from our [[Current Projects]] page could be resurrected and added to this new page. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 07:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Deletions ==
 +
 +
I have deleted things from this page which are either irrelevant (projects which we do not support or have nothing to do) or which will not be implemented.
 +
 +
As such I am not sure that this page is a useful one. "Ideas" without developer behind them should not clutter up the wiki. The place I deleted this page from is meant for ongoing discussions which reflect actual development or proposals for specifications by people who will actually implement them once agreed. So, not a free for all. [[User:Refdoc|refdoc]]:[[User_Talk:Refdoc|talk]]

Latest revision as of 18:39, 8 January 2018

Reason for this new page

I have begun this new page following the recent thread in sword-devel that began as a question regarding BREW Development. David Haslam 07:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Some of the stuff deleted from our Current Projects page could be resurrected and added to this new page. David Haslam 07:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletions

I have deleted things from this page which are either irrelevant (projects which we do not support or have nothing to do) or which will not be implemented.

As such I am not sure that this page is a useful one. "Ideas" without developer behind them should not clutter up the wiki. The place I deleted this page from is meant for ongoing discussions which reflect actual development or proposals for specifications by people who will actually implement them once agreed. So, not a free for all. refdoc:talk