Difference between revisions of "User:Dmsmith/KJV 2.6"
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Reference text policy: :: Crown Copyright applies to the Authorised Version ''per se'', not just to those printed by CUP, who are merely one of the licensed printers for all the works that come u) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Added words & the Divine Name: === Tagging the Divine Name === This much more complicated than we thought. Refer to private email until we have something more systematic to record here. ~~~~) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
We found one instance of the Divine Name element within a transChange element. This is probably inappropriate. | We found one instance of the Divine Name element within a transChange element. This is probably inappropriate. | ||
* The one example is in 2 Chronicles 17:4. It is rendered in italics and small caps. So accordingly it is an added word representing the tetragrammaton. It is represented properly in OSIS. --[[User:Dmsmith|Dmsmith]] 17:49, 18 February 2014 (MST) | * The one example is in 2 Chronicles 17:4. It is rendered in italics and small caps. So accordingly it is an added word representing the tetragrammaton. It is represented properly in OSIS. --[[User:Dmsmith|Dmsmith]] 17:49, 18 February 2014 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Tagging the Divine Name === | ||
| + | This much more complicated than we thought. Refer to private email until we have something more systematic to record here. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 05:11, 19 February 2014 (MST) | ||
== Reference text policy == | == Reference text policy == | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 19 February 2014
This page is for recommended changes to the KJV module version 2.6
Contents
Punctuation
1 Cor 15:27 The comma at "him, it is" should not be italicized. There should be a comma between "excepted which". --Dmsmith 11:19, 16 February 2014 (MST)
- Done --Dmsmith 17:54, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Words of Christ
The Old Scofield only highlights Words of Christ (WoC) as they come directly from his mouth. Not what others say he said. Not translation of what he said, such as translation from Aramaic. In 2.6, there are 3 error in markup (maybe more, but these are known). Red is what should be WoC, black is currently red, but shouldn't be:
Mat 8:26 And he saith unto them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then he arose, and rebuked the winds and the sea; and there was a great calm.
Mat 19:18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
Act 1:4 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
Added words
Added words & punctuation
Split all transChange elements that contain punctuation marks, so that the punctuation and following space is normal text. 1 Cor 15:27 is one example of many such occurrences.
- Found and fixed:
- 67 ,
- 10 ;
- 6 :
- 1 ?
--Dmsmith 18:38, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Added words & Strong's
Review and correct each instance in which a w element for Strong's & Morph is found within a transChange element. The markup probably belongs to the preceding word. The following are the instances and word(s) that precede that are not contained by a <w> element.
Gen 14.10 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0875">was full of</w></transChange> Exod 15.12 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02098">which</w></transChange> Exod 15.16 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02098">which</w></transChange> Exod 34.19 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02142" morph="strongMorph:TH8735">that is male</w></transChange> Num 1.16 These <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H07148">were</w></transChange> Num 3.19 These <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">are</w></transChange> Num 10.28 Thus <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0428">were</w></transChange> Num 13.3 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">were</w></transChange> Num 14.28 unto them, <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H03808">As truly as</w></transChange> Num 20.13 This <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">is</w></transChange> 1Sam 30.27 To <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0834">them</w></transChange> 2Kgs 19.31 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H06635" morph="strongMorph:TH8675">of hosts</w></transChange> 2Chr.10.16 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H07200" morph="strongMorph:TH8804">saw</w></transChange> Ezra 2.65 and <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0428">there were</w></transChange> Ps.17.6 unto me <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H08085" morph="strongMorph:TH8798">and hear</w></transChange> Ps 39.3 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">then</w></transChange> Jer 6.14 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01323" morph="strongMorph:TH8676">of the daughter</w></transChange> Jer 28.9 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">then</w></transChange> Jer.51.53 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">yet</w></transChange>
- I'll need some help determining how these should be changed, if at all. It may be that the KJV uses italics for a purpose other than "added" words. --Dmsmith 19:33, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Added words & the Divine Name
We found one instance of the Divine Name element within a transChange element. This is probably inappropriate.
- The one example is in 2 Chronicles 17:4. It is rendered in italics and small caps. So accordingly it is an added word representing the tetragrammaton. It is represented properly in OSIS. --Dmsmith 17:49, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Tagging the Divine Name
This much more complicated than we thought. Refer to private email until we have something more systematic to record here. David Haslam 05:11, 19 February 2014 (MST)
Reference text policy
It may be sensible to review whether we chose the most suitable published text as our reference standard. The most widely accepted one is the Cambridge University Press - Concord Reference Bible.
- Need two things: an e-text and permission for the text. (I think the "crown" claims copyright.) --Dmsmith 19:36, 18 February 2014 (MST)
- Crown Copyright applies to the Authorised Version per se, not just to those printed by CUP, who are merely one of the licensed printers for all the works that come under Letters of Royal Patent. Refer to our Copyright page David Haslam 05:08, 19 February 2014 (MST)
