Difference between revisions of "Talk:Osis2mod"

From CrossWire Bible Society
Jump to: navigation, search
(History of changes ?: What changes have been made since the last one (2012-03-24 r2693) documented in the main page?)
m (History of changes ?: Windows)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
What changes have been made since the last one (2012-03-24 r2693) documented in the main page?
 
What changes have been made since the last one (2012-03-24 r2693) documented in the main page?
:cf. I'm using the x64 versions of r2778 compiled (2013-01-28) by Greg.  [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 12:26, 17 May 2013 (MDT)
+
:cf. I'm using the Windows x64 versions of r2778 compiled (2013-01-28) by Greg.  [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 12:26, 17 May 2013 (MDT)
  
 
== Contained??? ==
 
== Contained??? ==

Revision as of 18:27, 17 May 2013

History of changes ?

Have there been any significant changes to osis2mod since 2009-06-06? If so, please update this section of the main page. David Haslam 19:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Still waiting! David Haslam 06:21, 13 November 2011 (MST)
It hasn't changed since then until yesterday. I still have a few more reported problems to look at. After these, I'll update the page:
  • ZText modules don't write the last bits to the module.
  • OSIS header text appearing in the module.
  • cipher might not be working
  • large text causes the program to crash (e.g. when used to build a commentary)
--Dmsmith 19:02, 13 November 2011 (MST)

What changes have been made since the last one (2012-03-24 r2693) documented in the main page?

cf. I'm using the Windows x64 versions of r2778 compiled (2013-01-28) by Greg. David Haslam 12:26, 17 May 2013 (MDT)

Contained???

The following item on the main page seems to be incorrectly worded.

InterVerse Content refers to all content not contained by the verse element.

In the milestone form of OSIS, verse elements are not containers! So using the verb "contained by" is confusing! David Haslam 12:00, 17 May 2013 (MDT)

I was very aware that the milestoned version of a verse element is not a physical container. But it is a logical container. The same issue holds true regarding all talk of begin and end elements, when dividing interverse material. I don't want to see the page be very complicated in its wording. If you can make it clearer, please do.--Dmsmith 12:06, 17 May 2013 (MDT)