Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fonts"
From CrossWire Bible Society
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (:::Code2000 displays the BurJudson module better than Padauk, at least in Xiphos. ~~~~) |
David Haslam (talk | contribs) (→Karen fonts: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: Done. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 02:18, 28 October 2011 (MDT) | :: Done. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 02:18, 28 October 2011 (MDT) | ||
:::Code2000 displays the BurJudson module better than Padauk, at least in Xiphos. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 04:19, 10 December 2011 (MST) | :::Code2000 displays the BurJudson module better than Padauk, at least in Xiphos. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 04:19, 10 December 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Karen fonts == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fonts available at the Karen Teacher Working Group include some non-Unicode legacy fonts. I have not yet determined whether any of the fonts are Unicode. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 04:21, 10 December 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 10 December 2011
Code2000
It should be noted that http://www.code2000.net/ doesn't exist anymore and it may have been GPL'd? Last time I looked around (August 2011?) that seemed to be the case, meaning it may become a first choice for many people? It is listed at http://sourceforge.net/projects/code2000/ --Niccarter 18:57, 27 October 2011 (MDT)
- Well then - we should just update the link in the main page. btw. I just installed it from sourceforge, and it displays Burmese OK. David Haslam 02:08, 28 October 2011 (MDT)
- Done. David Haslam 02:18, 28 October 2011 (MDT)
- Code2000 displays the BurJudson module better than Padauk, at least in Xiphos. David Haslam 04:19, 10 December 2011 (MST)
- Done. David Haslam 02:18, 28 October 2011 (MDT)
Karen fonts
The fonts available at the Karen Teacher Working Group include some non-Unicode legacy fonts. I have not yet determined whether any of the fonts are Unicode. David Haslam 04:21, 10 December 2011 (MST)
