Talk:Alternate Versification
Talk:Alternate Versification/Archive
Front-end support for av11n ?
I have removed this content, I thgink it is now truly irrelevant as all frontends we have listed as active support av11n. In fact, I would propose delisting any frontend which does not.... refdoc:talk 07:41, 8 January 2018 (MST)
In theory, there are several aspects to consider when looking at front-end application support for alternate versification:
- Can the module be installed at all, without causing the application to crash?
- Can an installed module with av11n be properly displayed with all of its content? Or with only some of its content?
- Can the application readily navigate to books and chapters that are outside the default v11n?
- For av11ns with a different book order, can the module be scrolled in the defined av11n book order?
- Can the application display two or more modules with different versifications in parallel mode (or as an interlinear view) with proper alignment of the text content?
Front-end support for av11n is at various stages of development. The av11n support status of some of the more popular front-ends is tabled here.
1.8.1
There is no agreement to put the following versifications into the source. While there is none it should not be in the main text
- Not yet released.
Liturgical variants[1] based on the Catholic liturgical translations (based itself on the neoVulgate), of which two correspond to existing Catholic versifications:
- Catholic_lit – like Catholic but with significant differences, Esther with 10 chapters.
- Catholic2_lit – like Catholic2 but with significant differences, Esther with 16 chapters.
- Catholic3_lit – corresponding to Catholic, but where Esther's alternate versification is integrated into the current 10 chapters, to allow a better reading. This means that the verses of the chapters numbered with letters are integrated into the current 10 chapters of Esther.
