Difference between revisions of "User:Dmsmith/KJV 2.6"
m (→Added words & Strong's) |
m (→Reference text policy) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Reference text policy == | == Reference text policy == | ||
| − | It may be sensible to review whether we chose the most suitable published text as our reference standard. The most widely accepted one is the Cambridge University Press - Concord Reference Bible. | + | It may be sensible to review whether we chose the most suitable published text as our reference standard. The most widely accepted one is the Cambridge University Press - Concord Reference Bible. |
| + | * Need two things: an e-text and permission for the text. (I think the "crown" claims copyright.) --[[User:Dmsmith|Dmsmith]] 19:36, 18 February 2014 (MST) | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 02:36, 19 February 2014
This page is for recommended changes to the KJV module version 2.6
Contents
Punctuation
1 Cor 15:27 The comma at "him, it is" should not be italicized. There should be a comma between "excepted which". --Dmsmith 11:19, 16 February 2014 (MST)
- Done --Dmsmith 17:54, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Added words
Added words & punctuation
Split all transChange elements that contain punctuation marks, so that the punctuation and following space is normal text. 1 Cor 15:27 is one example of many such occurrences.
- Found and fixed:
- 67 ,
- 10 ;
- 6 :
- 1 ?
--Dmsmith 18:38, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Added words & Strong's
Review and correct each instance in which a w element for Strong's & Morph is found within a transChange element. The markup probably belongs to the preceding word. The following are the instances and word(s) that precede that are not contained by a <w> element.
Gen 14.10 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0875">was full of</w></transChange> Exod 15.12 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02098">which</w></transChange> Exod 15.16 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02098">which</w></transChange> Exod 34.19 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H02142" morph="strongMorph:TH8735">that is male</w></transChange> Num 1.16 These <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H07148">were</w></transChange> Num 3.19 These <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">are</w></transChange> Num 10.28 Thus <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0428">were</w></transChange> Num 13.3 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">were</w></transChange> Num 14.28 unto them, <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H03808">As truly as</w></transChange> Num 20.13 This <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01992">is</w></transChange> 1Sam 30.27 To <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0834">them</w></transChange> 2Kgs 19.31 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H06635" morph="strongMorph:TH8675">of hosts</w></transChange> 2Chr.10.16 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H07200" morph="strongMorph:TH8804">saw</w></transChange> Ezra 2.65 and <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0428">there were</w></transChange> Ps.17.6 unto me <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H08085" morph="strongMorph:TH8798">and hear</w></transChange> Ps 39.3 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">then</w></transChange> Jer 6.14 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H01323" morph="strongMorph:TH8676">of the daughter</w></transChange> Jer 28.9 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">then</w></transChange> Jer.51.53 <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:H0227">yet</w></transChange>
- I'll need some help determining how these should be changed, if at all. It may be that the KJV uses italics for a purpose other than "added" words. --Dmsmith 19:33, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Added words & the Divine Name
We found one instance of the Divine Name element within a transChange element. This is probably inappropriate.
- The one example is in 2 Chronicles 17:4. It is rendered in italics and small caps. So accordingly it is an added word representing the tetragrammaton. It is represented properly in OSIS. --Dmsmith 17:49, 18 February 2014 (MST)
Reference text policy
It may be sensible to review whether we chose the most suitable published text as our reference standard. The most widely accepted one is the Cambridge University Press - Concord Reference Bible.
- Need two things: an e-text and permission for the text. (I think the "crown" claims copyright.) --Dmsmith 19:36, 18 February 2014 (MST)
