Talk:OSIS Tutorial - Revision history

David Haslam: /* Corrections to the tutorial */ :Some further edits today, including manual reversions where I had overlooked something yesterday. ~~~~

2011-10-18T08:30:02Z

‎Corrections to the tutorial: :Some further edits today, including manual reversions where I had overlooked something yesterday. ~~~~

David Haslam: /* Long s */ ::Also fixed in the XML portions. ~~~~

2011-10-18T08:28:59Z

‎Long s: ::Also fixed in the XML portions. ~~~~

David Haslam: /* Corrections to the tutorial */ new section

2011-10-17T15:08:44Z

‎Corrections to the tutorial: new section

David Haslam: /* Help in coding OSIS Ruby */ new section

2010-10-27T12:03:04Z

‎Help in coding OSIS Ruby: new section

David Haslam: /* Interlinear text */ new section

2009-08-21T16:19:17Z

‎Interlinear text: new section

Mwtalbert: Identifier Type confusion

2009-04-23T03:35:38Z

Identifier Type confusion

Wlerin: /* Long s */

2009-03-24T00:54:15Z

‎Long s

Wlerin: /* Long s */

2009-03-24T00:53:56Z

‎Long s

David Haslam: /* Long s */ :Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde.

2008-11-21T15:13:49Z

‎Long s: :Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde.

David Haslam: Long s

2008-11-21T15:12:25Z

Long s

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:30, 18 October 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:

	During my exercise of following the tutorial, I found that a few minor corrections were necessary. The only part I didn't check is the cross-reference example. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 09:08, 17 October 2011 (MDT)		During my exercise of following the tutorial, I found that a few minor corrections were necessary. The only part I didn't check is the cross-reference example. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 09:08, 17 October 2011 (MDT)
		+	:Some further edits today, including manual reversions where I had overlooked something yesterday. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 02:30, 18 October 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 18 October 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Long s is equivalent to &#383; and I have replaced 'f' with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Long s is equivalent to &#383; and I have replaced 'f' with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Also fixed in the XML portions. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 02:28, 18 October 2011 (MDT)

	== Identifier Type ==		== Identifier Type ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 17 October 2011
Line 33:		Line 33:

	The OSIS tutorial could do with an example of how to code OSIS Ruby. Please would someone who knows about this add a new subsection. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)		The OSIS tutorial could do with an example of how to code OSIS Ruby. Please would someone who knows about this add a new subsection. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Corrections to the tutorial ==
		+
		+	During my exercise of following the tutorial, I found that a few minor corrections were necessary. The only part I didn't check is the cross-reference example. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 09:08, 17 October 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 27 October 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Not much in the CrossWire wiki about "interlinear". A search for the word gave only two hits.		Not much in the CrossWire wiki about "interlinear". A search for the word gave only two hits.
	Therefore the subject needs more adequately describing in the wiki. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 16:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)		Therefore the subject needs more adequately describing in the wiki. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 16:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Help in coding OSIS Ruby ==
		+
		+	The OSIS tutorial could do with an example of how to code OSIS Ruby. Please would someone who knows about this add a new subsection. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 21 August 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:

	In the example given here, the identifier type is given as "KJV.TutorEncoding", while in Calvin's Commentaries the identifier is "Bible.CalvinCommentaries". Why is KJV used in one place, and Bible in the other? What is appropriate to use for a commentary? (as a side note, I was under the impression that sample commentaries were available. If so, could they be linked from this page or the OSIS commentary page?) --[[User:Mwtalbert\|Mwtalbert]] 03:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)		In the example given here, the identifier type is given as "KJV.TutorEncoding", while in Calvin's Commentaries the identifier is "Bible.CalvinCommentaries". Why is KJV used in one place, and Bible in the other? What is appropriate to use for a commentary? (as a side note, I was under the impression that sample commentaries were available. If so, could they be linked from this page or the OSIS commentary page?) --[[User:Mwtalbert\|Mwtalbert]] 03:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Interlinear text ==
		+
		+	There is a discussion thread (started July 24, 2007) in the '''Sword Dev''' archives about interlinear markup.
		+
		+	The messages came under these three subjects:
		+
		+	* OSIS recommendations to SIL/JAARS
		+	* Best way to encode interlinear texts in OSIS?
		+	* Re: Interlinear text in HTML?
		+
		+	Not much in the CrossWire wiki about "interlinear". A search for the word gave only two hits.
		+	Therefore the subject needs more adequately describing in the wiki. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 16:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 23 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Long s is equivalent to &#383; and I have replaced 'f' with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Long s is equivalent to &#383; and I have replaced 'f' with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Identifier Type ==
		+
		+	In the example given here, the identifier type is given as "KJV.TutorEncoding", while in Calvin's Commentaries the identifier is "Bible.CalvinCommentaries". Why is KJV used in one place, and Bible in the other? What is appropriate to use for a commentary? (as a side note, I was under the impression that sample commentaries were available. If so, could they be linked from this page or the OSIS commentary page?) --[[User:Mwtalbert\|Mwtalbert]] 03:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 24 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde. This get converted automatically to your username with a timestamp. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)		:Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde. This get converted automatically to your username with a timestamp. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

−	Long s is equivalent to &#383;, and I have replaced f with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)	+	Long s is equivalent to &#383; and I have replaced 'f' with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 24 March 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde. This get converted automatically to your username with a timestamp. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)		:Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde. This get converted automatically to your username with a timestamp. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	Long s is equivalent to &#383;, and I have replaced f with it in the example text, where appropriate. --[[User:Wlerin\|Wlerin]] 00:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 21 November 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	It is thus plain wrong (in that it alters the meaning of the content, "fifh" not being the same word as "fish" at all, nor, obviously, to move to the New Testament, is Jefus the same as Jesus) to write f where the original has a long s -- the proper representation of long s in a font which does not have that glyph is the ordinary, "round" s.		It is thus plain wrong (in that it alters the meaning of the content, "fifh" not being the same word as "fish" at all, nor, obviously, to move to the New Testament, is Jefus the same as Jesus) to write f where the original has a long s -- the proper representation of long s in a font which does not have that glyph is the ordinary, "round" s.
		+
		+	:Please sign edits to discussion pages by adding four tilde. This get converted automatically to your username with a timestamp. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 21 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Long s ==
		+
	I would like to take issue with the representation of the "long s" of the original text with the letter 'f'.		I would like to take issue with the representation of the "long s" of the original text with the letter 'f'.