Talk:BibTeX entries - Revision history

David Haslam: /* Bibtex or BibTeX ? */ :I see this is done. ''Thanks''. ~~~~

2011-01-13T11:19:46Z

‎Bibtex or BibTeX ?: :I see this is done. ''Thanks''. ~~~~

Refdoc: moved Talk:Bibtex entries to Talk:BibTeX entries

2011-01-12T14:34:22Z

moved Talk:Bibtex entries to Talk:BibTeX entries

Refdoc: /* Lowercase for keywords? */

2011-01-12T14:33:47Z

‎Lowercase for keywords?

David Haslam: /* Lowercase for keywords? */ new section

2011-01-11T10:44:36Z

‎Lowercase for keywords?: new section

David Haslam: /* Separate the modules? */ new section

2011-01-11T10:21:08Z

‎Separate the modules?: new section

David Haslam: Bibtex or BibTeX ?

2011-01-11T10:18:57Z

Bibtex or BibTeX ?

New page

== Bibtex or BibTeX ? ==

The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 13 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)		The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	:I see this is done. ''Thanks''. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 11:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

	== Separate the modules? ==		== Separate the modules? ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:33, 12 January 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	The Wikipedia page for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX BibTeX] shows all the keywords as lowercase. Your first stab has "year" like this, but the others have initial capitals. Does this matter? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)		The Wikipedia page for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX BibTeX] shows all the keywords as lowercase. Your first stab has "year" like this, but the others have initial capitals. Does this matter? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	No, is the short answer [[User:Refdoc\|refdoc]]:[[User_Talk:Refdoc\|talk]] 14:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 11 January 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)		It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Lowercase for keywords? ==
		+
		+	The Wikipedia page for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX BibTeX] shows all the keywords as lowercase. Your first stab has "year" like this, but the others have initial capitals. Does this matter? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 11 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)		The proper CamelCase name for it is BibTeX. Should we move the page? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Separate the modules? ==
		+
		+	It would help if each module was separated in it's own <pre> ... <\pre> block. Easier to move things around for improved categorization. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 10:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:34, 12 January 2011
(No difference)