User:Dmsmith/KJV2011 - Revision history

David Haslam: /* Pilcrow signs */ : See User:Dmsmith/KJV 2.6#Pilcrow_signs – this was never actioned from here in this page. ~~~~

2016-01-22T21:20:55Z

‎Pilcrow signs: : See User:Dmsmith/KJV 2.6#Pilcrow_signs – this was never actioned from here in this page. ~~~~

David Haslam: /* Hyphenation */ and 'you-ward' (factual - minor correction)

2015-12-22T14:22:42Z

‎Hyphenation: and 'you-ward' (factual - minor correction)

David Haslam: /* Pilcrow signs */ ::: This is no longer the case! ~~~~

2015-09-11T15:49:32Z

‎Pilcrow signs: ::: This is no longer the case! ~~~~

David Haslam: /* Pilcrow signs */ :::'''Xiphos 4.0.4''' does not add any space after the ¶ so maybe that special code was never implemented? ~~~~

2015-09-11T15:46:59Z

‎Pilcrow signs: :::'''Xiphos 4.0.4''' does not add any space after the ¶ so maybe that special code was never implemented? ~~~~

David Haslam: /* Cross references? */ cut section to clipboard

2014-02-19T13:12:17Z

‎Cross references?: cut section to clipboard

Dmsmith at 04:32, 16 February 2014

2014-02-16T04:32:35Z

David Haslam: /* Downloads */ details

2013-05-13T11:28:24Z

‎Downloads: details

David Haslam: /* Cross references? */ == Downloads ==

2013-05-13T11:25:12Z

‎Cross references?: == Downloads ==

David Haslam: /* Apostrophes */ :::::: I was wrong (in part) about how search indices work. And Bible includes the apostrophes in an index, so a search using the Android keyboard to enter one does find the right wo

2013-02-19T19:11:30Z

‎Apostrophes: :::::: I was wrong (in part) about how search indices work. And Bible includes the apostrophes in an index, so a search using the Android keyboard to enter one does find the right wo

David Haslam: /* Apostrophes */ ::: Interesting! Our modules should follow the 1769 text, as described in the conf files. And DM's policy is to refer to the Oxford University Press edition as the ''de facto'' refer

2013-02-19T16:12:52Z

‎Apostrophes: ::: Interesting! Our modules should follow the 1769 text, as described in the conf files. And DM's policy is to refer to the Oxford University Press edition as the ''de facto'' refer

@@ Line 276: / Line 276: @@
 === Pilcrow signs ===
-* In printed editions of the KJV, there is normally a space immediately after the ¶. When viewed with Xiphos, there is no such space.<BR>This is not an artifact of how the SWORD engine handles the OSIS markup. Example:
+: See [[User:Dmsmith/KJV 2.6#Pilcrow_signs]] &ndash; this was never actioned from here in this page. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 14:20, 22 January 2016 (MST)
 == Downloads ==

@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 : I've fixed Bar-jesus to have an ndash. --[[User:Dmsmith|Dmsmith]] 12:28, 21 July 2012 (MDT)
-cf. With 3 exceptions, all the 250 'hyphenated' ''proper'' names in the OT have an '''ndash''', whereas hyphenated ''ordinary'' words have a '''plain hyphen'''.<br>These are: 'God-ward', 'thee-ward', 'us-ward'. These three also occur in the NT, with the addition of 'joint-heirs'.
+cf. With 3 exceptions, all the 250 'hyphenated' ''proper'' names in the OT have an '''ndash''', whereas hyphenated ''ordinary'' words have a '''plain hyphen'''.<br>These are: 'God-ward', 'thee-ward', 'us-ward'. These three also occur in the NT, with the addition of 'joint-heirs' and 'you-ward'.
 : What are the other 2 exceptions? I can't find them. --[[User:Dmsmith|Dmsmith]] 12:28, 21 July 2012 (MDT)
 ::My wording was a bit ambiguous. The 3 exceptions are not proper names. They are the 3 words listed above. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 03:47, 16 August 2012 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 11 September 2015
Line 284:		Line 284:

	::Slight complication! – when the verse starts as red letters, the space is already displayed after the Pilcrow. Compare Matthew 22:11 with Matthew 22:15. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 08:28, 14 November 2011 (MST)		::Slight complication! – when the verse starts as red letters, the space is already displayed after the Pilcrow. Compare Matthew 22:11 with Matthew 22:15. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 08:28, 14 November 2011 (MST)
		+	::: This is no longer the case! [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 09:49, 11 September 2015 (MDT)

	:: On second look, it would be a fine solution, but Xiphos already has special code to add the space. The change should not be made if it is disruptive to Xiphos. --[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 07:21, 17 November 2011 (MST)		:: On second look, it would be a fine solution, but Xiphos already has special code to add the space. The change should not be made if it is disruptive to Xiphos. --[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 07:21, 17 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 11 September 2015
Line 288:		Line 288:

	:::Surely two spaces (where there are red letters) is preferable to not having any space after the pilcrow elsewhere? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:22, 28 May 2012 (MDT)		:::Surely two spaces (where there are red letters) is preferable to not having any space after the pilcrow elsewhere? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:22, 28 May 2012 (MDT)
		+
		+	:::'''Xiphos 4.0.4''' does not add any space after the ¶ so maybe that special code was never implemented? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 09:46, 11 September 2015 (MDT)

	== Downloads ==		== Downloads ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 19 February 2014
Line 288:		Line 288:

	:::Surely two spaces (where there are red letters) is preferable to not having any space after the pilcrow elsewhere? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:22, 28 May 2012 (MDT)		:::Surely two spaces (where there are red letters) is preferable to not having any space after the pilcrow elsewhere? [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 12:22, 28 May 2012 (MDT)
−
−	~~=== Cross references? ===~~
−	Sadly lacking from our KJV module are any scripture cross-references. Many printed editions of the AV contain such references. We should explore how the module might be enhanced by obtaining the data from a suitable electronic source.

	== Downloads ==		== Downloads ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 16 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	This page is now closed. This work was finished 5 Oct 2013 and released 15 Feb 2014.
		+
	Reporting and planning page for minor text and markup issues to improve the KJV module. This is a continuation of the work done by [[User:Dmsmith\|DM Smith]] in [http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006 Project KJV2006].		Reporting and planning page for minor text and markup issues to improve the KJV module. This is a continuation of the work done by [[User:Dmsmith\|DM Smith]] in [http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006 Project KJV2006].

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 13 May 2013
Line 291:		Line 291:

	== Downloads ==		== Downloads ==
		+	Interim downloads of the latest development update of the KJV are available at [http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/sword/2011/].
		+
		+	'''Note'''
		+	# AV.zip and KJV.zip are the same module, but the one renamed AV permits installing it without replacing the latest release of the KJV module.

	== KJVA module ==		== KJVA module ==

@@ Line 289: / Line 289: @@
 === Cross references? ===
 Sadly lacking from our KJV module are any scripture cross-references. Many printed editions of the AV contain such references. We should explore how the module might be enhanced by obtaining the data from a suitable electronic source.
 == KJVA module ==

@@ Line 339: / Line 339: @@
 ::::: How confusing! What we call an apostrophe is not an apostrophe - how & why did the Unicode consortium reach this decision?<BR>
 ::::: Were it not for the fact that punctuation marks are discarded from the search index, it would surely make searching for possessives more difficult! [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 09:07, 19 February 2013 (MST)
 Modern English doesn't use an apostrophe with the possessive pronoun ours and yours, so the following verse should be reviewed. There is also a full-stop missing from this verse.

@@ Line 343: / Line 343: @@
 * 1 Maccabees 12:23 We do write back again to you, that your cattle and goods are our’s, and our’s are your’s We do command therefore our ambassadors to make report unto you on this wise.
 :: I checked David Norton's KJV and the companion 'Textual History' volume (which lists variants). Neither acknowledge 'our's' or 'your's'. However, one of two printed KJV Apocrypha volumes I have does have the apostrophes in ours & yours. It's ABS's edition, which unfortunately has no useful publication information. (It claims to be the 1611 edition, but clearly uses modern orthography.) Checking the Chadwyck-Healey Bible in English database, the actual 1611 KJV did not exhibit apostrophes. All of them have the missing period. --[[User:Osk|Osk]] 08:56, 19 February 2013 (MST)
 [[Category:Modules|KJV2011]]
 [[Category:English Bibles|KJV2011]]