Talk:OSIS Book Abbreviations - Revision history

David Haslam: /* OSIS validation and OSIS Book Abbreviations */ new section

2020-06-23T09:39:28Z

‎OSIS validation and OSIS Book Abbreviations: new section

2012-09-03T02:07:25Z

‎Ethiopic Broader Canon

2012-09-03T02:07:01Z

‎LBA used twice

2012-08-27T11:39:23Z

matched table headings to the data page.

2012-08-27T10:44:53Z

‎Missing Abbreviations: Are no longer missing.

2012-08-27T10:43:02Z

‎LBA used twice: new section

2012-08-27T03:14:34Z

‎Books of questionable canonicity/biblicality

2012-08-27T03:14:25Z

‎Mentioned in canon lists, but absent from known codices

2012-08-27T03:12:06Z

‎Books of questionable canonicity/biblicality

2012-08-27T03:11:00Z

‎Some books not included

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 23 June 2020
Line 181:		Line 181:
	The Paratext abbreviation LBA is used for EpBar and Barn. Is this correct?--[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 04:43, 27 August 2012 (MDT)		The Paratext abbreviation LBA is used for EpBar and Barn. Is this correct?--[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 04:43, 27 August 2012 (MDT)
	: Good catch. And yes, it is apparently correct, where correct is defined as being an accurate reflection of the Paratext proposal at http://lc.bfbs.org.uk/e107_files/downloads/canonicalissuesinparatext.pdf. In practice, none of the Apostolic Fathers abbreviations were adopted into the Paratext codes, so LBA is officially EpBar. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:07, 2 September 2012 (MDT)		: Good catch. And yes, it is apparently correct, where correct is defined as being an accurate reflection of the Paratext proposal at http://lc.bfbs.org.uk/e107_files/downloads/canonicalissuesinparatext.pdf. In practice, none of the Apostolic Fathers abbreviations were adopted into the Paratext codes, so LBA is officially EpBar. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:07, 2 September 2012 (MDT)
		+
		+	== OSIS validation and OSIS Book Abbreviations ==
		+
		+	The various .xsd files used for validating OSIS XML files are ''agnostic'' with regard to '''Book Abbreviations''', so any that are miskeyed or misspelled will not be reported as validation fails. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] ([[User talk:David Haslam\|talk]]) 09:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 !Alternate Names
 !Paratext Abbreviation
 |-
 |SinodosS

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 3 September 2012
Line 185:		Line 185:

	The Paratext abbreviation LBA is used for EpBar and Barn. Is this correct?--[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 04:43, 27 August 2012 (MDT)		The Paratext abbreviation LBA is used for EpBar and Barn. Is this correct?--[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 04:43, 27 August 2012 (MDT)
		+	: Good catch. And yes, it is apparently correct, where correct is defined as being an accurate reflection of the Paratext proposal at http://lc.bfbs.org.uk/e107_files/downloads/canonicalissuesinparatext.pdf. In practice, none of the Apostolic Fathers abbreviations were adopted into the Paratext codes, so LBA is officially EpBar. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:07, 2 September 2012 (MDT)

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-|'''''osisID'''''
+!osisID
-|'''''Book Name'''''
+!Book Name
-|'''''Alternate Names'''''
+!Alternate Names
-|'''''Paratext Abbreviation'''''
+!Paratext Abbreviation
 |-
 |PsJos
@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-|'''''osisID'''''
+!osisID
-|'''''Book Name'''''
+!Book Name
-|'''''Alternate Names'''''
+!Alternate Names
-|'''''Paratext Abbreviation'''''
+!Paratext Abbreviation
 |-
 |2En
@@ Line 136: / Line 136: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-|'''''osisID'''''
+!osisID
-|'''''Book Name'''''
+!Book Name
-|'''''Alternate Names'''''
+!Alternate Names
-|'''''Paratext Abbreviation'''''
+!Paratext Abbreviation
 |-
 |ApocPet
@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-|'''''osisID'''''
+!osisID
-|'''''Book Name'''''
+!Book Name
-|'''''Alternate Names'''''
+!Alternate Names
-|'''''Paratext Abbreviation'''''
+!Paratext Abbreviation
 |-
 |AposCon

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 The link in reference 1 is broken. The ''SBL Handbook of Style'' seems to now be an item that one has to purchase. i.e. No longer a free PDF download. See [https://secure.aidcvt.com/sbl/ProdDetails.asp?ID=069002C&PG=1&Type=BL&PCS=SBL]. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 08:26, 10 July 2011 (MDT)
 :See also [http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/publishingwithsbl.aspx] which includes a link under "(You must login to download The SBL Handbook of Style)". [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 08:31, 10 July 2011 (MDT)
 == Introductions ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 27 August 2012
Line 188:		Line 188:
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}
		+
		+	== LBA used twice ==
		+
		+	The Paratext abbreviation LBA is used for EpBar and Barn. Is this correct?--[[User:Dmsmith\|Dmsmith]] 04:43, 27 August 2012 (MDT)

@@ Line 181: / Line 181: @@
 |Ascension of Isaiah
 |{Known from Ethiopic, but not considered canonical; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon#cite_note-Ascension-54 Wikipedia], citing [http://www.ranhacohen.info/Biblia.html] claims that Charles' translation of AscenIsa is part of Dillmann's Bible, but Dillmann had died by the time Charles published his translation and I can find no evidence to suggest that AscenIsa was ever included in any Bible; [http://biblestudymagazine.com/interactive/canon/ Logos' Bible Study Magazine] also claims this is canonical in the Ethiopic canon, but I think they're wrong about a few items in their chart and they give no evidence for their claim.}
+|
 |}

@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 |Acts of Paul
 |{Contains: ActsPaulThecla, EpCorPaul, 3Cor, MartPaul, etc.; Mentioned in Cod. Claromontanus}
+|
 |}

@@ Line 172: / Line 172: @@
 |'''''Alternate Names'''''
 |'''''Paratext Abbreviation'''''
 |-
 |AposCon
 |Apostolic Constitutions and Canons
-|{Identifies itself as canonical, along with the canonical books of the Bible (minus Rev), Did, 1Clem, & 2Clem.}
+|{Identifies itself as canonical, along with the canonical books of the Bible (minus Rev), Did, 1Clem, & 2Clem; claimed canonical in Coptic Orthodox tradition(?)}
+|
 |-

@@ Line 160: / Line 160: @@
 |ActsPaulThecla
 |Acts of Paul and Thecla
-|Acts of Thecla/Acts of Thekla{Known from various eastern churches, but not held to be canonical; denounced by Tertullian}
+|Acts of Thecla/Acts of Thekla{Known from various eastern churches, but not held to be canonical; denounced by Tertullian; [http://biblestudymagazine.com/interactive/canon/ Logos' Bible Study Magazine] claims this is included in Syriac Bibles, but I think they're wrong about a few items in their chart and they give no evidence for their claim--they may be confusing Syriac with Armenian and ActsPaulThecla with EpCorPaul, given their failure to mention EpCorPaul--unless 3Cor is meant to subsume EpCorPaul.}
+|
 |}