Talk:DevTools:Modules - Revision history

David Haslam: /* Module submission */ new section

2018-05-30T13:41:13Z

‎Module submission: new section

Anonymous at 04:33, 30 June 2009

2009-06-30T04:33:34Z

Anonymous at 04:32, 30 June 2009

2009-06-30T04:32:35Z

Osk at 20:05, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T20:05:16Z

Osk: /* re: Fontsize roll-back */

2008-11-10T20:04:51Z

‎re: Fontsize roll-back

Refdoc: quirement

2008-11-10T17:02:16Z

quirement

Osk at 14:28, 8 November 2008

2008-11-08T14:28:27Z

Osk: /* GBF Support */

2008-10-01T03:05:51Z

‎GBF Support

David Haslam: Made two headers up one level

2008-09-30T18:56:30Z

Made two headers up one level

David Haslam: === CC Licenses? === (ins. header to force ToC)

2008-09-30T18:55:30Z

=== CC Licenses? === (ins. header to force ToC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 30 May 2018
Line 34:		Line 34:

	::Fontsize was only ever mentioned on the GnomeSword development list, never on sword-devel. And no argument has been given for why this is important or necessary. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		::Fontsize was only ever mentioned on the GnomeSword development list, never on sword-devel. And no argument has been given for why this is important or necessary. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Module submission ==
		+
		+	Please review section 2.8 in view of new page [[Module Submission]]. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] ([[User talk:David Haslam\|talk]]) 13:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 30 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	* [http://caoloca.com/letocnadelro.html cnacnaoule]
−	~~http://calinoeltc.com/acolotrchi.html[cnacnaoule] [[http://calinoeltc.com/acolotrchi.html][cnacnaoule]]~~
−	* http://deltacaze.com/chiboclacs.html cnacnaoule
−	* [[http://coricald.com/racvardomv.html cnacnaoule]]
−	* [[http://troctaroelt.com/getcounocoer.html\|cnacnaoule]]
−	* [[http://coorrac.com/vividr.html \| cnacnaoule]]
−	* [http://errictrocc.com/cazelc.html\|cnacnaoule]
−	* [cnacnaoule\|http://vivartrocle.com/bascalino.html]
−	* ((http://dronerrola.com/chiletopasr.html cnacnaoule))
−	* [cnacnaoule](http://eltvil.com/elc4tzelorol.html "cnacnaoule")
−	~~"cnacnaoule":http://letoricc4.com/bositbas.html~~
−
	== CC Licenses? ==		== CC Licenses? ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 30 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	* [http://caoloca.com/letocnadelro.html cnacnaoule]
		+	http://calinoeltc.com/acolotrchi.html[cnacnaoule] [[http://calinoeltc.com/acolotrchi.html][cnacnaoule]]
		+	* http://deltacaze.com/chiboclacs.html cnacnaoule
		+	* [[http://coricald.com/racvardomv.html cnacnaoule]]
		+	* [[http://troctaroelt.com/getcounocoer.html\|cnacnaoule]]
		+	* [[http://coorrac.com/vividr.html \| cnacnaoule]]
		+	* [http://errictrocc.com/cazelc.html\|cnacnaoule]
		+	* [cnacnaoule\|http://vivartrocle.com/bascalino.html]
		+	* ((http://dronerrola.com/chiletopasr.html cnacnaoule))
		+	* [cnacnaoule](http://eltvil.com/elc4tzelorol.html "cnacnaoule")
		+	"cnacnaoule":http://letoricc4.com/bositbas.html
		+
	== CC Licenses? ==		== CC Licenses? ==

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 Proposal and implementation in one front-end do not result in immediate inclusion of new attributes in our .conf format specification. BTW: This is exactly the kind of thing that concerns me about making the Wiki into the public face of CrossWire. --[[User:Osk|Osk]] 14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-I would think that absence of negative comment (including yours) on the mailing list for several days  is something akin to approval. Particularly as the requirement is real. [[User:Refdoc|Refdoc]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
+:I would think that absence of negative comment (including yours) on the mailing list for several days  is something akin to approval. Particularly as the requirement is real. [[User:Refdoc|Refdoc]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-Fontsize was only ever mentioned on the GnomeSword development list, never on sword-devel. And no argument has been given for why this is important or necessary. --[[User:Osk|Osk]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
+::Fontsize was only ever mentioned on the GnomeSword development list, never on sword-devel. And no argument has been given for why this is important or necessary. --[[User:Osk|Osk]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 10 November 2008
Line 32:		Line 32:

	I would think that absence of negative comment (including yours) on the mailing list for several days is something akin to approval. Particularly as the requirement is real. [[User:Refdoc\|Refdoc]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		I would think that absence of negative comment (including yours) on the mailing list for several days is something akin to approval. Particularly as the requirement is real. [[User:Refdoc\|Refdoc]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	Fontsize was only ever mentioned on the GnomeSword development list, never on sword-devel. And no argument has been given for why this is important or necessary. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 10 November 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	==re: Fontsize roll-back==		==re: Fontsize roll-back==
	Proposal and implementation in one front-end do not result in immediate inclusion of new attributes in our .conf format specification. BTW: This is exactly the kind of thing that concerns me about making the Wiki into the public face of CrossWire. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)		Proposal and implementation in one front-end do not result in immediate inclusion of new attributes in our .conf format specification. BTW: This is exactly the kind of thing that concerns me about making the Wiki into the public face of CrossWire. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	I would think that absence of negative comment (including yours) on the mailing list for several days is something akin to approval. Particularly as the requirement is real. [[User:Refdoc\|Refdoc]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 8 November 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:
	In one section we say "willing to accept ThML and GBF", and in another "GBF is deprecated". Seems a little inconsistent. -- [[User:Jmmorgan\|Jmmorgan]] 06:47, 30 September 2008 (MDT)		In one section we say "willing to accept ThML and GBF", and in another "GBF is deprecated". Seems a little inconsistent. -- [[User:Jmmorgan\|Jmmorgan]] 06:47, 30 September 2008 (MDT)
	:I think the former statement was very old. We will accept some ThML work (on the condition that it be content from CCEL). But ThML is certainly deprecated. And there's no reason for which I would accept a GBF submission. There's simply no good reason to still be using GBF. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 21:05, 30 September 2008 (MDT)		:I think the former statement was very old. We will accept some ThML work (on the condition that it be content from CCEL). But ThML is certainly deprecated. And there's no reason for which I would accept a GBF submission. There's simply no good reason to still be using GBF. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 21:05, 30 September 2008 (MDT)
		+
		+	==re: Fontsize roll-back==
		+	Proposal and implementation in one front-end do not result in immediate inclusion of new attributes in our .conf format specification. BTW: This is exactly the kind of thing that concerns me about making the Wiki into the public face of CrossWire. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 1 October 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:
	==GBF Support==		==GBF Support==
	In one section we say "willing to accept ThML and GBF", and in another "GBF is deprecated". Seems a little inconsistent. -- [[User:Jmmorgan\|Jmmorgan]] 06:47, 30 September 2008 (MDT)		In one section we say "willing to accept ThML and GBF", and in another "GBF is deprecated". Seems a little inconsistent. -- [[User:Jmmorgan\|Jmmorgan]] 06:47, 30 September 2008 (MDT)
		+	:I think the former statement was very old. We will accept some ThML work (on the condition that it be content from CCEL). But ThML is certainly deprecated. And there's no reason for which I would accept a GBF submission. There's simply no good reason to still be using GBF. --[[User:Osk\|Osk]] 21:05, 30 September 2008 (MDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=== CC Licenses? ===
+== CC Licenses? ==
 I haven't seen any of the CC licenses in any module so far and I have not seen this discussed on sword-devel. While these licenses make sense these cryptic strings do not. I think these should be openly discussed. -- DM Smith, 9/20/07
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 How do "Creative Commons: by-nc-nd" and similar strings sound? They give someone actually looking at our metadata enough info to know to look at CC. I don't see a need for any more since the license strings are really not intended to be presented to users. -- Osk 2007-09-22
-===conf file: GlobalOptionFilter===
+==conf file: GlobalOptionFilter==
 The text here does not represent swmgr.cpp correctly - should it?
 *OSISLemma

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 30 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	=== CC Licenses? ===
		+
	I haven't seen any of the CC licenses in any module so far and I have not seen this discussed on sword-devel. While these licenses make sense these cryptic strings do not. I think these should be openly discussed. -- DM Smith, 9/20/07		I haven't seen any of the CC licenses in any module so far and I have not seen this discussed on sword-devel. While these licenses make sense these cryptic strings do not. I think these should be openly discussed. -- DM Smith, 9/20/07