Talk:Alternate Versification - Revision history

Refdoc at 14:41, 8 January 2018

2018-01-08T14:41:33Z

Refdoc: /* 1.8.1 */

2018-01-08T14:23:37Z

‎1.8.1

Refdoc at 14:22, 8 January 2018

2018-01-08T14:22:53Z

Refdoc at 14:22, 8 January 2018

2018-01-08T14:22:42Z

David Haslam: /* French Bibles */ ::SWORD 1.8.0 includes three new versifications for French Bibles. --~~~~

2018-01-08T13:02:54Z

‎French Bibles: ::SWORD 1.8.0 includes three new versifications for French Bibles. --~~~~

David Haslam: /* Catholic_lit, etc */ new section

2018-01-08T13:01:50Z

‎Catholic_lit, etc: new section

David Haslam: /* SynodalP */ :The name has been changed to '''SynodalProt'''. ~~~~

2014-12-12T11:37:35Z

‎SynodalP: :The name has been changed to '''SynodalProt'''. ~~~~

David Haslam: /* SynodalP */ new section

2012-07-06T07:44:47Z

‎SynodalP: new section

David Haslam: /* French Bibles */ added comment

2012-01-04T10:48:04Z

‎French Bibles: added comment

David Haslam: /* French Bibles */ new section

2012-01-04T10:45:09Z

‎French Bibles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 8 January 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Talk:Alternate Versification/Archive]]		[[Talk:Alternate Versification/Archive]]
		+	== Front-end support for av11n ? ==
		+
		+	'''I have removed this content, I thgink it is now truly irrelevant as all frontends we have listed as active support av11n. In fact, I would propose delisting any frontend which does not.... '''[[User:Refdoc\|refdoc]]:[[User_Talk:Refdoc\|talk]] 07:41, 8 January 2018 (MST)
		+
		+	In theory, there are several aspects to consider when looking at front-end application support for alternate versification:
		+	# Can the module be installed at all, without causing the application to crash?
		+	# Can an installed module with av11n be properly displayed with all of its content? Or with only some of its content?
		+	# Can the application readily navigate to books and chapters that are outside the default v11n?
		+	# For av11ns with a different book order, can the module be ''scrolled'' in the defined av11n book order?
		+	# Can the application display two or more modules with ''different'' versifications in parallel mode (or as an interlinear view) with proper alignment of the text content?
		+	Front-end support for av11n is at various stages of development. The av11n support status of some of the more popular front-ends is tabled [[Choosing a SWORD program#Module_Support\|here]].

	==1.8.1==		==1.8.1==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==1.8.1==
-There is no agreement to put the following versifications into the source. While there is none it should not be in the main text=== 1.8.1 ===
+There is no agreement to put the following versifications into the source. While there is none it should not be in the main text
 :''Not yet released.''
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 * '''Catholic3_lit''' &ndash; corresponding to Catholic, but where Esther's alternate versification is integrated into the current 10 chapters, to allow a better reading. This means that the verses of the chapters numbered with letters are integrated into the current 10 chapters of Esther.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 8 January 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[~~Ralk~~:Alternate Versification/Archive]]	+	[[Talk:Alternate Versification/Archive]]

	==1.8.1==		==1.8.1==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Go Bible Forum topic on Different Versification Systems ==
+[[Ralk:Alternate Versification/Archive]]
-A topic on versification schemes has been added in the Go Bible Forum. See [http://jolon.org/vanillaforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=745]. Initial focus is for Slavic languages (e.g. Russian, Ukrainian).  I'm adding this link here in case further useful information gets posted. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 09:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
+==1.8.1==
-== Heading levels in wikimedia pages ==
+There is no agreement to put the following versifications into the source. While there is none it should not be in the main text=== 1.8.1 ===
-The general preference is that only the page title should be at top heading level. [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 17:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
+:''Not yet released.''
-== How to identify whether an existing alternate versification scheme matches requirements? ==
+* '''Catholic2_lit''' &ndash; like Catholic2 but with significant differences, Esther with 16 chapters.
-If a new [[Module Requests|module request]] requires alternate versification, how can we help to identify whether the requirements match a scheme that already exists at CrossWire? [[User:David Haslam|David Haslam]] 16:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Catholic3_lit''' &ndash; corresponding to Catholic, but where Esther's alternate versification is integrated into the current 10 chapters, to allow a better reading. This means that the verses of the chapters numbered with letters are integrated into the current 10 chapters of Esther.
-== SWORD release versions? ==
+'''Notes:'''
+<references/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 8 January 2018
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:The consequences of not having one is that we all too easily fail to catch the module issues such as verses missing at the end of many Psalms. We cannot rely indefinitely on the fact that a few of us happen to know what to look for. The software tools used during module creation and testing should report such errors. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:48, 4 January 2012 (MST)		:The consequences of not having one is that we all too easily fail to catch the module issues such as verses missing at the end of many Psalms. We cannot rely indefinitely on the fact that a few of us happen to know what to look for. The software tools used during module creation and testing should report such errors. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:48, 4 January 2012 (MST)
		+
		+	::SWORD 1.8.0 includes three new versifications for French Bibles. --[[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] ([[User talk:David Haslam\|talk]]) 06:02, 8 January 2018 (MST)

	== SynodalP ==		== SynodalP ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 8 January 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:

	:The name has been changed to '''SynodalProt'''. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 04:37, 12 December 2014 (MST)		:The name has been changed to '''SynodalProt'''. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 04:37, 12 December 2014 (MST)
		+
		+	== Catholic_lit, etc ==
		+
		+	It's quite likely that the three '''Catholic_lit''' av11ns may be deferred to SWORD 1.8.2 --[[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] ([[User talk:David Haslam\|talk]]) 06:01, 8 January 2018 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 12 December 2014
Line 43:		Line 43:

	The versification called '''SynodalP''' is now deprecated - it is not supported by the latest Sword utilities. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 01:44, 6 July 2012 (MDT)		The versification called '''SynodalP''' is now deprecated - it is not supported by the latest Sword utilities. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 01:44, 6 July 2012 (MDT)
		+
		+	:The name has been changed to '''SynodalProt'''. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 04:37, 12 December 2014 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 6 July 2012
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:The consequences of not having one is that we all too easily fail to catch the module issues such as verses missing at the end of many Psalms. We cannot rely indefinitely on the fact that a few of us happen to know what to look for. The software tools used during module creation and testing should report such errors. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:48, 4 January 2012 (MST)		:The consequences of not having one is that we all too easily fail to catch the module issues such as verses missing at the end of many Psalms. We cannot rely indefinitely on the fact that a few of us happen to know what to look for. The software tools used during module creation and testing should report such errors. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:48, 4 January 2012 (MST)
		+
		+	== SynodalP ==
		+
		+	The versification called '''SynodalP''' is now deprecated - it is not supported by the latest Sword utilities. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 01:44, 6 July 2012 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 4 January 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:

	We need a versification system defining for French Bibles, so that we can properly address some of the related issues we encounter in French modules. See (for example) http://www.crosswire.org/bugs/browse/MOD-186 [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:45, 4 January 2012 (MST)		We need a versification system defining for French Bibles, so that we can properly address some of the related issues we encounter in French modules. See (for example) http://www.crosswire.org/bugs/browse/MOD-186 [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:45, 4 January 2012 (MST)
		+
		+	:The consequences of not having one is that we all too easily fail to catch the module issues such as verses missing at the end of many Psalms. We cannot rely indefinitely on the fact that a few of us happen to know what to look for. The software tools used during module creation and testing should report such errors. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:48, 4 January 2012 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 4 January 2012
Line 33:		Line 33:

	I added this section because the USFM reference use the term "alternate versification" in a ''different sense'' than we have been hitherto discussing within CrossWire. It's a necessary distinction to be aware of, and perhaps one that will promote further creative thinking. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 06:43, 9 July 2011 (MDT)		I added this section because the USFM reference use the term "alternate versification" in a ''different sense'' than we have been hitherto discussing within CrossWire. It's a necessary distinction to be aware of, and perhaps one that will promote further creative thinking. [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 06:43, 9 July 2011 (MDT)
		+
		+	== French Bibles ==
		+
		+	We need a versification system defining for French Bibles, so that we can properly address some of the related issues we encounter in French modules. See (for example) http://www.crosswire.org/bugs/browse/MOD-186 [[User:David Haslam\|David Haslam]] 03:45, 4 January 2012 (MST)